<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (4) TMI 430 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258548</link>
    <description>The appeal against the rejection of refund of input service credit for export of &quot;service&quot; prior to a specific date under Notification No. 5/2006-CE (NT) was dismissed on 13.3.2015. The appellants, a 100% EOU (STPI Unit) exporting &#039;Information Technology Software Services,&#039; were not exporting any &quot;output service&quot; before 16/5/2008, making Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules inapplicable. The judgment upheld the rejection of the refund claim, deeming the impugned order legally sound. The reference to Board Circular No. 54/2004-Cus and relevant judgments did not support the appellants&#039; position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719893" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (4) TMI 430 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258548</link>
      <description>The appeal against the rejection of refund of input service credit for export of &quot;service&quot; prior to a specific date under Notification No. 5/2006-CE (NT) was dismissed on 13.3.2015. The appellants, a 100% EOU (STPI Unit) exporting &#039;Information Technology Software Services,&#039; were not exporting any &quot;output service&quot; before 16/5/2008, making Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules inapplicable. The judgment upheld the rejection of the refund claim, deeming the impugned order legally sound. The reference to Board Circular No. 54/2004-Cus and relevant judgments did not support the appellants&#039; position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>