<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308745</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act for seized goods. The court held that the assessee, a booking agent, was not liable for the goods found in booked parcels as ownership was claimed by the angarias who booked the parcels. The court emphasized that the onus to prove ownership rested with the angarias, absolving the assessee of any tax liability related to the seized goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2023 15:14:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1283 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308745</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act for seized goods. The court held that the assessee, a booking agent, was not liable for the goods found in booked parcels as ownership was claimed by the angarias who booked the parcels. The court emphasized that the onus to prove ownership rested with the angarias, absolving the assessee of any tax liability related to the seized goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>