<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 705 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, PUNJAB</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440432</link>
    <description>Shifting of transmission lines and construction or installation of substations or transmission lines for third parties on a contribution basis were treated as a separate taxable service under GST, not as exempt electricity transmission. The activity was classified under service heading 998631 and valued on the transaction value, comprising the total amount recovered for material, labour and supervision. It was not regarded as a works contract on the facts. Input tax credit on the related material and services was held admissible because they were used in the course or furtherance of business, and the fact that the asset remained owned by the applicant did not bar credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 11:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 705 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, PUNJAB</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440432</link>
      <description>Shifting of transmission lines and construction or installation of substations or transmission lines for third parties on a contribution basis were treated as a separate taxable service under GST, not as exempt electricity transmission. The activity was classified under service heading 998631 and valued on the transaction value, comprising the total amount recovered for material, labour and supervision. It was not regarded as a works contract on the facts. Input tax credit on the related material and services was held admissible because they were used in the course or furtherance of business, and the fact that the asset remained owned by the applicant did not bar credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>