<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 388 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33350</link>
    <description>Kerala HC held that a company&#039;s eligibility for tonnage tax scheme under section 115VP cannot be determined solely by examining object clauses in memorandum of association. The court interpreted &quot;main object&quot; in section 115VC(d) based on actual business activities rather than formal documentation requirements under Companies Act. HC quashed the decision denying tonnage tax benefits and remanded the matter to statutory appellate authority for consideration of other eligibility criteria, ruling that companies incorporated before 1965 amendment need not classify objects as principal or ancillary in their constitutional documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2025 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 388 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33350</link>
      <description>Kerala HC held that a company&#039;s eligibility for tonnage tax scheme under section 115VP cannot be determined solely by examining object clauses in memorandum of association. The court interpreted &quot;main object&quot; in section 115VC(d) based on actual business activities rather than formal documentation requirements under Companies Act. HC quashed the decision denying tonnage tax benefits and remanded the matter to statutory appellate authority for consideration of other eligibility criteria, ruling that companies incorporated before 1965 amendment need not classify objects as principal or ancillary in their constitutional documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>