<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1501 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308742</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the respondent&#039;s appeal against the assessment order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) due to it being against a non-existing entity. ITAT held that such a jurisdictional defect rendered the assessment proceedings illegal and void, affirming the importance of proper jurisdiction in assessment procedures. The court concurred with ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the significance of addressing jurisdictional defects to maintain the legality of orders. The appeal was ultimately dismissed for lacking merit, highlighting the necessity of upholding jurisdictional integrity in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 21:53:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1501 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308742</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the respondent&#039;s appeal against the assessment order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) due to it being against a non-existing entity. ITAT held that such a jurisdictional defect rendered the assessment proceedings illegal and void, affirming the importance of proper jurisdiction in assessment procedures. The court concurred with ITAT&#039;s decision, emphasizing the significance of addressing jurisdictional defects to maintain the legality of orders. The appeal was ultimately dismissed for lacking merit, highlighting the necessity of upholding jurisdictional integrity in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>