<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 940 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308734</link>
    <description>The appeals arose from High Court orders related to a Civil Writ Petition seeking pay fixation benefits. The appellants sought to match their pay with that of their junior employee. The High Court initially dismissed the petition as infructuous. Subsequent review petitions were dismissed, and a modification application was also rejected. The appeals argued for relief for both appellants based on pay parity. The court held that the senior employee could not be paid less than the junior and directed pay parity benefits for both appellants. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and relief was granted to both appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:26:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 940 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308734</link>
      <description>The appeals arose from High Court orders related to a Civil Writ Petition seeking pay fixation benefits. The appellants sought to match their pay with that of their junior employee. The High Court initially dismissed the petition as infructuous. Subsequent review petitions were dismissed, and a modification application was also rejected. The appeals argued for relief for both appellants based on pay parity. The court held that the senior employee could not be paid less than the junior and directed pay parity benefits for both appellants. The High Court&#039;s judgment was set aside, and relief was granted to both appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>