<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Countervailing and Special Additional Duty Demand Limited to Normal Period; No Fraud or Suppression Found in Sulphur Import Case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70947</link>
    <description>Demand of duty (CVD &amp; SAD) foregone at the time of import - The quantity of imported Sulphur, which was not used in manufacture of fertilizer - the said clearances of Sulphuric Acid were made under the cover of excise invoices, on payment of appropriate central excise duty and duly mentioned in the ER-1 returns filed and other Central Excise records which have been audited by the department at periodical intervals. In such a situation, no charge of suppression or willful mis-statement and fraud etc., can be alleged against the Appellant - the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in this case. Hence, the duty demand has to be limited only to the normal period of limitation. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:43:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:43:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Countervailing and Special Additional Duty Demand Limited to Normal Period; No Fraud or Suppression Found in Sulphur Import Case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70947</link>
      <description>Demand of duty (CVD &amp; SAD) foregone at the time of import - The quantity of imported Sulphur, which was not used in manufacture of fertilizer - the said clearances of Sulphuric Acid were made under the cover of excise invoices, on payment of appropriate central excise duty and duly mentioned in the ER-1 returns filed and other Central Excise records which have been audited by the department at periodical intervals. In such a situation, no charge of suppression or willful mis-statement and fraud etc., can be alleged against the Appellant - the extended period of limitation cannot be invoked in this case. Hence, the duty demand has to be limited only to the normal period of limitation. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:43:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>