<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 633 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440360</link>
    <description>The court set aside the judgment and order passed by the CESTAT, ruling in favor of the appellant. As the assessee had already paid the duty from March 1, 2006, no further liability was imposed. The appeals were allowed, and the related miscellaneous application was disposed of without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 08:29:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 633 - MEGHALAYA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440360</link>
      <description>The court set aside the judgment and order passed by the CESTAT, ruling in favor of the appellant. As the assessee had already paid the duty from March 1, 2006, no further liability was imposed. The appeals were allowed, and the related miscellaneous application was disposed of without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>