<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1290 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308723</link>
    <description>Under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005, market fee (Mandi Shulk) realised by a commission agent in sales or purchases of agricultural produce is included in &quot;sale price&quot;. The statutory definition in Section 2(42) was read to cover not only the dealer&#039;s consideration but also sums charged in the nature of duty or shulk, subject only to express exclusions. The Court treated the Hindi text as consistent with the English expression &quot;any other duty&quot; and held that market fee falls within that inclusive wording. It also noted that a fee may have the character of tax when imposed to raise general revenue, and the circular was upheld as reflecting the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 11:23:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1290 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308723</link>
      <description>Under the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005, market fee (Mandi Shulk) realised by a commission agent in sales or purchases of agricultural produce is included in &quot;sale price&quot;. The statutory definition in Section 2(42) was read to cover not only the dealer&#039;s consideration but also sums charged in the nature of duty or shulk, subject only to express exclusions. The Court treated the Hindi text as consistent with the English expression &quot;any other duty&quot; and held that market fee falls within that inclusive wording. It also noted that a fee may have the character of tax when imposed to raise general revenue, and the circular was upheld as reflecting the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>