<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 624 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440351</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax order, ruling that the petitioner must first exhaust statutory remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act. The court emphasized the availability of alternative appeal mechanism and declined to intervene through Article 226, thereby preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the order through prescribed legal channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 624 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440351</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax order, ruling that the petitioner must first exhaust statutory remedies under Section 107 of CGST Act. The court emphasized the availability of alternative appeal mechanism and declined to intervene through Article 226, thereby preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the order through prescribed legal channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>