<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 607 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that if no addition is made on the item for which the assessment was reopened, no further addition can be justified. The Tribunal deleted the additional income added by the Assessing Officer, amounting to Rs. 5,35,262/-. Precedents from various High Courts supported this legal principle, emphasizing that any additional income discovered during reassessment should be linked to the original item in question. The order was pronounced on July 11, 2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719627" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 607 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that if no addition is made on the item for which the assessment was reopened, no further addition can be justified. The Tribunal deleted the additional income added by the Assessing Officer, amounting to Rs. 5,35,262/-. Precedents from various High Courts supported this legal principle, emphasizing that any additional income discovered during reassessment should be linked to the original item in question. The order was pronounced on July 11, 2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>