<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 606 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the Assessing Officer. The expenses claimed as revenue by the assessee, relating to repairs essential for the petrol pump business, were deemed revenue in nature as they did not create an enduring benefit. Relying on legal precedent, including the decision in CIT vs Reliance Petroproducts Pvt Ltd, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 08:02:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 606 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) by the Assessing Officer. The expenses claimed as revenue by the assessee, relating to repairs essential for the petrol pump business, were deemed revenue in nature as they did not create an enduring benefit. Relying on legal precedent, including the decision in CIT vs Reliance Petroproducts Pvt Ltd, the Tribunal concluded that the penalty was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>