<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 605 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 54 instead of Section 54F, emphasizing the more favorable treatment for the assessee. It found that the revised grounds of appeal were accepted rightfully without violating Rule 46A. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the cross objection by the assessee was deemed infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 13:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 605 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under Section 54 instead of Section 54F, emphasizing the more favorable treatment for the assessee. It found that the revised grounds of appeal were accepted rightfully without violating Rule 46A. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the cross objection by the assessee was deemed infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>