<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 587 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant, not being a Claimant, Creditor, or Participant, was not entitled to a copy of the Resolution Plan before its approval by the Adjudicating Authority. The appeal was dismissed as the Appellant lacked locus standi, and there was no provision in the relevant legal framework requiring the provision of the Resolution Plan to individuals in the Appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 08:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 587 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Appellant, not being a Claimant, Creditor, or Participant, was not entitled to a copy of the Resolution Plan before its approval by the Adjudicating Authority. The appeal was dismissed as the Appellant lacked locus standi, and there was no provision in the relevant legal framework requiring the provision of the Resolution Plan to individuals in the Appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>