<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 580 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440307</link>
    <description>Physician samples of medicines cleared free of cost remain liable to excise duty because duty is attracted by manufacture, not sale. For valuation of such free samples, the applicable method is pro-rata valuation under rule 4, not the cost-plus method under rule 8, even where the goods are otherwise covered by section 4A. The authorities therefore rejected the appellant&#039;s rule 8 valuation and sustained the demand, interest, and penalty, following the principle affirmed by the Larger Bench and the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 580 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440307</link>
      <description>Physician samples of medicines cleared free of cost remain liable to excise duty because duty is attracted by manufacture, not sale. For valuation of such free samples, the applicable method is pro-rata valuation under rule 4, not the cost-plus method under rule 8, even where the goods are otherwise covered by section 4A. The authorities therefore rejected the appellant&#039;s rule 8 valuation and sustained the demand, interest, and penalty, following the principle affirmed by the Larger Bench and the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>