<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 579 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440306</link>
    <description>The impugned order dated 15.07.2022, challenging the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on a refund claim for excess duty payment, was set aside. The Department&#039;s attempt to reopen the Tribunal&#039;s order without filing an appeal was deemed impermissible. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of upholding judicial discipline and respecting the finality of orders, ruling in favor of the appellant and allowing the appeal with consequential relief, if any, as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 08:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 579 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440306</link>
      <description>The impugned order dated 15.07.2022, challenging the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision on a refund claim for excess duty payment, was set aside. The Department&#039;s attempt to reopen the Tribunal&#039;s order without filing an appeal was deemed impermissible. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of upholding judicial discipline and respecting the finality of orders, ruling in favor of the appellant and allowing the appeal with consequential relief, if any, as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>