https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308719 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging a letter and provisional attachment orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court held that the petitioners failed to disclose important facts, such as the confirmation of provisional attachment orders and pending appeals. As the final attachment orders had been issued and not challenged, the court ruled that the relief sought in the writ petitions could not be granted. The court advised the petitioners to pursue legal remedies against subsequent orders and granted them liberty to challenge those orders. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Jul 2023 07:57:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308719 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging a letter and provisional attachment orders under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The court held that the petitioners failed to disclose important facts, such as the confirmation of provisional attachment orders and pending appeals. As the final attachment orders had been issued and not challenged, the court ruled that the relief sought in the writ petitions could not be granted. The court advised the petitioners to pursue legal remedies against subsequent orders and granted them liberty to challenge those orders. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308719