<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1653 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308718</link>
    <description>A jurisdictional objection was raised to the MSME Facilitation Council&#039;s reference, on the basis that the dispute concerned statutory audit fees governed by the Income-tax Act rather than a claim within the MSMED Act framework. The Court noted that the fees had already been paid pursuant to earlier judicial directions and that any grievance about such payment would ordinarily fall within the Income-tax Act regime. Relying on the non obstante effect of Section 24 of the MSMED Act, the Court formed a prima facie view that the Council could not invoke jurisdiction once the statutory audit fees had been paid in terms of the Court&#039;s order, and stayed the proceedings and the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2023 07:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1653 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308718</link>
      <description>A jurisdictional objection was raised to the MSME Facilitation Council&#039;s reference, on the basis that the dispute concerned statutory audit fees governed by the Income-tax Act rather than a claim within the MSMED Act framework. The Court noted that the fees had already been paid pursuant to earlier judicial directions and that any grievance about such payment would ordinarily fall within the Income-tax Act regime. Relying on the non obstante effect of Section 24 of the MSMED Act, the Court formed a prima facie view that the Council could not invoke jurisdiction once the statutory audit fees had been paid in terms of the Court&#039;s order, and stayed the proceedings and the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>