<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 865 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308713</link>
    <description>Transfer of a criminal corruption case under Section 406 CrPC was sought on the ground that most witnesses were based in Maharashtra and the Delhi trial caused inconvenience to the accused and witnesses. The Court applied the ends of justice standard and treated convenience of the parties, prosecution, accused and witnesses as relevant to a fair and impartial trial. It noted that the case had become Delhi-centric despite the witness concentration in Maharashtra and ordered transfer from Delhi to Thane for expeditious disposal and convenience of all concerned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:59:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 865 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308713</link>
      <description>Transfer of a criminal corruption case under Section 406 CrPC was sought on the ground that most witnesses were based in Maharashtra and the Delhi trial caused inconvenience to the accused and witnesses. The Court applied the ends of justice standard and treated convenience of the parties, prosecution, accused and witnesses as relevant to a fair and impartial trial. It noted that the case had become Delhi-centric despite the witness concentration in Maharashtra and ordered transfer from Delhi to Thane for expeditious disposal and convenience of all concerned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308713</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>