<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 559 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440286</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. It was concluded that the liability to pay advance tax on capital gains from the sale of property arose only after the registration of the sale agreement, not before, based on the legal and factual analysis of the timeline of events related to the sale transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 08:15:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 559 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440286</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] and dismissed the appeal of the Revenue. It was concluded that the liability to pay advance tax on capital gains from the sale of property arose only after the registration of the sale agreement, not before, based on the legal and factual analysis of the timeline of events related to the sale transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>