<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 553 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440280</link>
    <description>A later CBDT circular was treated as unable to retrospectively add a separate notification requirement for invoking a most-favoured-nation clause, so the more restrictive fees for technical services definition from the India-Portugal treaty could be applied for the relevant year under the India-Belgium arrangement. The document also applies the make available test to installation, supervision and commissioning services, stating that such payments are not fees for technical services unless technical knowledge, skill, know-how or process is transferred so the recipient can perform the service independently. On that reasoning, the remittance was not taxable as fees for technical services and no tax deduction was required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 553 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440280</link>
      <description>A later CBDT circular was treated as unable to retrospectively add a separate notification requirement for invoking a most-favoured-nation clause, so the more restrictive fees for technical services definition from the India-Portugal treaty could be applied for the relevant year under the India-Belgium arrangement. The document also applies the make available test to installation, supervision and commissioning services, stating that such payments are not fees for technical services unless technical knowledge, skill, know-how or process is transferred so the recipient can perform the service independently. On that reasoning, the remittance was not taxable as fees for technical services and no tax deduction was required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>