https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440279 The Court allowed the petitioners' request for their advocate to be present during their interrogation under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, at a visible but non-audible distance. This decision was made to prevent coercive methods during interrogation, despite opposition referencing past judgments disallowing such presence. The interim order granting this relief was upheld, and the writ petition was disposed of, permitting the advocate's presence during future interrogations. en-us Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Nov 2023 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440279 The Court allowed the petitioners' request for their advocate to be present during their interrogation under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962, at a visible but non-audible distance. This decision was made to prevent coercive methods during interrogation, despite opposition referencing past judgments disallowing such presence. The interim order granting this relief was upheld, and the writ petition was disposed of, permitting the advocate's presence during future interrogations. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440279