https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440278 Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, allowing the matter to be heard on merits. The Supreme Court then declined interference with the impugned order because the dispute was covered by concurrent findings of fact recorded by the authorities below, and an identical issue had already been dismissed by the Court in a separate appeal. On that basis, the Court found no reason to disturb the order and dismissed the appeal. en-us Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440278 Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, allowing the matter to be heard on merits. The Supreme Court then declined interference with the impugned order because the dispute was covered by concurrent findings of fact recorded by the authorities below, and an identical issue had already been dismissed by the Court in a separate appeal. On that basis, the Court found no reason to disturb the order and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440278