https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308692 Irregularities or omissions in the procedural steps for attachment before judgment do not by themselves render the attachment a nullity, because the requirements as to mode of service, spot attachment and proclamation are treated as directory where official acts are presumed regular in the absence of positive proof to the contrary. The attachment was therefore valid. Once the attachment subsisted, any subsequent transfer by the judgment-debtors was ineffective against the attaching decree-holder under Section 64 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the plaintiff acquired no title under the sale deed. The sale was void against the attachment and the dismissal of the suit was upheld. en-us Thu, 04 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 15:46:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308692 Irregularities or omissions in the procedural steps for attachment before judgment do not by themselves render the attachment a nullity, because the requirements as to mode of service, spot attachment and proclamation are treated as directory where official acts are presumed regular in the absence of positive proof to the contrary. The attachment was therefore valid. Once the attachment subsisted, any subsequent transfer by the judgment-debtors was ineffective against the attaching decree-holder under Section 64 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the plaintiff acquired no title under the sale deed. The sale was void against the attachment and the dismissal of the suit was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308692