<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 235 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33313</link>
    <description>Duty-free clearances under a CT-2 certificate remained conditional on the authorised quantity limit, and goods cleared beyond that limit were liable to duty. A party that accepts and benefits from a concession subject to restrictions cannot later challenge the restriction while retaining the benefit. The demand was confined to the excess quantity alone, and the duty demand on clearances beyond the CT-2 authorisation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 235 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33313</link>
      <description>Duty-free clearances under a CT-2 certificate remained conditional on the authorised quantity limit, and goods cleared beyond that limit were liable to duty. A party that accepts and benefits from a concession subject to restrictions cannot later challenge the restriction while retaining the benefit. The demand was confined to the excess quantity alone, and the duty demand on clearances beyond the CT-2 authorisation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>