<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 234 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33309</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that Notification No. 20/2001 does not apply when there is no requirement to declare retail sale prices. Transactions with Doon School were deemed not covered by the notification due to bulk purchases. Duty demand was upheld, penalties set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal allowed, partially granting relief to the party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 234 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33309</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that Notification No. 20/2001 does not apply when there is no requirement to declare retail sale prices. Transactions with Doon School were deemed not covered by the notification due to bulk purchases. Duty demand was upheld, penalties set aside, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal allowed, partially granting relief to the party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>