<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 519 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440246</link>
    <description>The AAR Kerala ruled that a contract between the State Government and a business entity for extracting sand and mud from a dam reservoir constitutes a service supply from the government to the applicant. The service falls under SAC 997337 (licensing services for mineral rights) and attracts 18% GST. The applicant, as the recipient of service from the State Government, is liable to pay GST on reverse charge basis under Notification No. 13/2017 on the Rs. 15 crores consideration. The exemption claim under Entry No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017 was rejected as the applicant was receiving services from, not providing services to, the government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2025 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 519 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440246</link>
      <description>The AAR Kerala ruled that a contract between the State Government and a business entity for extracting sand and mud from a dam reservoir constitutes a service supply from the government to the applicant. The service falls under SAC 997337 (licensing services for mineral rights) and attracts 18% GST. The applicant, as the recipient of service from the State Government, is liable to pay GST on reverse charge basis under Notification No. 13/2017 on the Rs. 15 crores consideration. The exemption claim under Entry No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017 was rejected as the applicant was receiving services from, not providing services to, the government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440246</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>