<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 500 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440227</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to apply the DTAA rates of 10% for tax deduction and refund the excess tax deducted. The Tribunal clarified that Section 248 should be interpreted to allow appeals for excess tax deduction and emphasized the applicability of DTAA rates over higher rates due to the absence of PAN.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2023 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 500 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440227</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to apply the DTAA rates of 10% for tax deduction and refund the excess tax deducted. The Tribunal clarified that Section 248 should be interpreted to allow appeals for excess tax deduction and emphasized the applicability of DTAA rates over higher rates due to the absence of PAN.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>