<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 495 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the transfer of property to the daughter-in-law was a gift, not a sale, and therefore not subject to capital gains tax. As a result, the issues regarding the sale consideration under Section 50C and the deduction under Section 54F were not addressed separately and deemed infructuous. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 495 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the transfer of property to the daughter-in-law was a gift, not a sale, and therefore not subject to capital gains tax. As a result, the issues regarding the sale consideration under Section 50C and the deduction under Section 54F were not addressed separately and deemed infructuous. The appeal was partly allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>