https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308678 Inherent jurisdiction may be used to quash an FIR and investigation where the materials do not disclose a prima facie offence, the accusations are inherently improbable, or the proceedings appear mala fide. On the facts noted, the alleged confession and seizure material did not reliably support the prosecution version, and the contemporaneous sale transaction, reflected in income-tax records, made the case improbable. The allegations also did not establish cheating, conspiracy, forgery, use of a false document, or the offence under Section 294A. The criminal proceedings were therefore treated as unsustainable at the threshold. en-us Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jul 2023 07:39:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308678 Inherent jurisdiction may be used to quash an FIR and investigation where the materials do not disclose a prima facie offence, the accusations are inherently improbable, or the proceedings appear mala fide. On the facts noted, the alleged confession and seizure material did not reliably support the prosecution version, and the contemporaneous sale transaction, reflected in income-tax records, made the case improbable. The allegations also did not establish cheating, conspiracy, forgery, use of a false document, or the offence under Section 294A. The criminal proceedings were therefore treated as unsustainable at the threshold. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308678