<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1452 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308681</link>
    <description>In a suit for specific performance, a plaint may be rejected as against particular defendants where the pleadings and contract disclose no agreement or enforceable cause of action against them, even if the suit can continue against other parties. The court noted that specific performance lies only against parties to the contract, and that rejection in such a situation is not an impermissible partial rejection on merits but rejection insofar as those defendants are concerned. It also stated that where co-equal Supreme Court decisions conflict, the earlier decision remains binding unless later distinguished or explained, and the earlier ruling on rejection of plaint against some defendants was followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2023 07:39:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1452 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308681</link>
      <description>In a suit for specific performance, a plaint may be rejected as against particular defendants where the pleadings and contract disclose no agreement or enforceable cause of action against them, even if the suit can continue against other parties. The court noted that specific performance lies only against parties to the contract, and that rejection in such a situation is not an impermissible partial rejection on merits but rejection insofar as those defendants are concerned. It also stated that where co-equal Supreme Court decisions conflict, the earlier decision remains binding unless later distinguished or explained, and the earlier ruling on rejection of plaint against some defendants was followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>