https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308685 A taxpayer was permitted to have counsel present at a visible but not audible distance during recording of a statement under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax framework, and videography was allowed at the taxpayer's cost. The request was limited to regulated presence of the advocate, and the authorities raised no objection to that safeguard or to videography. In light of the concession and prior orders relied on, the requested protective arrangements were accepted, securing controlled legal assistance during the statement recording process. en-us Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308685 A taxpayer was permitted to have counsel present at a visible but not audible distance during recording of a statement under the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax framework, and videography was allowed at the taxpayer's cost. The request was limited to regulated presence of the advocate, and the authorities raised no objection to that safeguard or to videography. In light of the concession and prior orders relied on, the requested protective arrangements were accepted, securing controlled legal assistance during the statement recording process. Case-Laws GST Mon, 10 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308685