https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308669 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) depends on where the cause of action, wholly or in part, actually arises. In the tender matter discussed, the material events occurred at Bombay: the notice, bid submission, document scrutiny, fire tests and impugned communication. Communications received at Nagpur, including a corrigendum, opening date and certificate query, were only incidental and did not form an integral part of the cause of action. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable before the Nagpur Bench and was to be presented before the Principal Seat at Bombay. en-us Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jul 2023 12:47:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308669 Territorial jurisdiction under Article 226(2) depends on where the cause of action, wholly or in part, actually arises. In the tender matter discussed, the material events occurred at Bombay: the notice, bid submission, document scrutiny, fire tests and impugned communication. Communications received at Nagpur, including a corrigendum, opening date and certificate query, were only incidental and did not form an integral part of the cause of action. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable before the Nagpur Bench and was to be presented before the Principal Seat at Bombay. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308669