<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 465 - ITAT AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440192</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal concerning the addition of unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2012-13. The addition related to Gaurav Viradia was overturned as the appellant provided substantial evidence to establish the legitimacy of the transaction. However, the addition regarding Alpesh Patel was upheld due to the appellant&#039;s failure to prove the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2023 13:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 465 - ITAT AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440192</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal concerning the addition of unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2012-13. The addition related to Gaurav Viradia was overturned as the appellant provided substantial evidence to establish the legitimacy of the transaction. However, the addition regarding Alpesh Patel was upheld due to the appellant&#039;s failure to prove the creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>