<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 446 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440173</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the vehicles imported by Polaris India were correctly classified under CTH 8704 and 8709, not CTH 8703 as reclassified by the Principal Commissioner. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order, quashing the demand for customs duty, interest, penalty, and redemption fine. The Tribunal emphasized that the burden of proof for reclassification lay with the Department, which failed to provide sufficient evidence. The appeal by Polaris India was allowed, and the extended period of limitation and penalty were deemed inapplicable due to a lack of intent to evade duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 446 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440173</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the vehicles imported by Polaris India were correctly classified under CTH 8704 and 8709, not CTH 8703 as reclassified by the Principal Commissioner. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Principal Commissioner&#039;s order, quashing the demand for customs duty, interest, penalty, and redemption fine. The Tribunal emphasized that the burden of proof for reclassification lay with the Department, which failed to provide sufficient evidence. The appeal by Polaris India was allowed, and the extended period of limitation and penalty were deemed inapplicable due to a lack of intent to evade duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>