https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440172 Delhi HC held that a suit cannot be dismissed at the threshold under Order XII Rule 6 or Order XV Rule 2 CPC unless there is a clear, unambiguous and unconditional admission. In a dispute over ownership and transfer of 500 shares, non-production of some share transfer deeds did not amount to a conclusive admission because the plaintiffs relied on annual returns and the register of members as supporting evidence. Allegations of forgery and the competing counter-claim raised disputed questions of fact that could not be resolved summarily and required trial. The application for dismissal was therefore rejected for absence of an unequivocal admission. en-us Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jul 2023 08:03:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440172 Delhi HC held that a suit cannot be dismissed at the threshold under Order XII Rule 6 or Order XV Rule 2 CPC unless there is a clear, unambiguous and unconditional admission. In a dispute over ownership and transfer of 500 shares, non-production of some share transfer deeds did not amount to a conclusive admission because the plaintiffs relied on annual returns and the register of members as supporting evidence. Allegations of forgery and the competing counter-claim raised disputed questions of fact that could not be resolved summarily and required trial. The application for dismissal was therefore rejected for absence of an unequivocal admission. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440172