<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 434 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order. It held that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) was vague, the services should be classified under Works Contract Services (WCS), the appellant was eligible for the composition scheme, and the demand was not sustainable due to the limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 434 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order. It held that the Show Cause Notice (SCN) was vague, the services should be classified under Works Contract Services (WCS), the appellant was eligible for the composition scheme, and the demand was not sustainable due to the limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>