<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 425 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440152</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Excise duty, amounting to Rs.5,70,431, against the Appellant, a manufacturer of Copper Enamelled Wire, for the period April 2008 to March 2013. The Tribunal found that the audit team&#039;s reliance on electricity consumption to allege clandestine production was flawed, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence beyond electricity usage. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal ruled that electricity consumption alone is insufficient to establish duty evasion without additional proof of unaccounted manufacturing or clandestine removal. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the Appeal, providing consequential relief to the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 425 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440152</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Excise duty, amounting to Rs.5,70,431, against the Appellant, a manufacturer of Copper Enamelled Wire, for the period April 2008 to March 2013. The Tribunal found that the audit team&#039;s reliance on electricity consumption to allege clandestine production was flawed, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence beyond electricity usage. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal ruled that electricity consumption alone is insufficient to establish duty evasion without additional proof of unaccounted manufacturing or clandestine removal. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the Appeal, providing consequential relief to the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>