https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440149 Under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, a conditional stay requiring further deposit of 25% of the disputed tax and a bank guarantee was treated as unwarranted where the appellant had already made the prescribed payment at the time of filing the appeal. The appellate authority's additional conditions were considered unjustified in light of the appeal remaining pending for a considerable period. The matter was therefore to be decided within a fixed time, and coercive recovery was restrained in the meantime to protect the appellant pending disposal of the statutory appeal. en-us Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jul 2023 22:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440149 Under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, a conditional stay requiring further deposit of 25% of the disputed tax and a bank guarantee was treated as unwarranted where the appellant had already made the prescribed payment at the time of filing the appeal. The appellate authority's additional conditions were considered unjustified in light of the appeal remaining pending for a considerable period. The matter was therefore to be decided within a fixed time, and coercive recovery was restrained in the meantime to protect the appellant pending disposal of the statutory appeal. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440149