<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 421 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440148</link>
    <description>An award that has attained finality is enforceable as a judgment-debt, and the award-debtor cannot unilaterally reduce the decretal amount by deducting tax at source unless the award or decree expressly permits it. The cited tax provisions did not authorise withholding part of the awarded sum before payment to the award-holder, so the deduction was impermissible and the award-holder was entitled to receive the full balance amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 421 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440148</link>
      <description>An award that has attained finality is enforceable as a judgment-debt, and the award-debtor cannot unilaterally reduce the decretal amount by deducting tax at source unless the award or decree expressly permits it. The cited tax provisions did not authorise withholding part of the awarded sum before payment to the award-holder, so the deduction was impermissible and the award-holder was entitled to receive the full balance amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>