https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308653 The court dismissed the petitioner's application for custodial interrogation under the Customs Act, emphasizing that the court lacked jurisdiction and the petitioner failed to provide valid grounds for questioning. The judgment highlighted constitutional provisions protecting personal liberties and preventing self-incrimination, concluding that custodial interrogation solely for recording the respondent's statement was unjustified. As a result, the criminal petition was dismissed, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:16:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308653 The court dismissed the petitioner's application for custodial interrogation under the Customs Act, emphasizing that the court lacked jurisdiction and the petitioner failed to provide valid grounds for questioning. The judgment highlighted constitutional provisions protecting personal liberties and preventing self-incrimination, concluding that custodial interrogation solely for recording the respondent's statement was unjustified. As a result, the criminal petition was dismissed, and related miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308653