https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308659 Bombay HC allowed petition seeking advocate's presence during customs interrogation. Following SC precedent in Vijay Sajnani vs. Union of India, court permitted petitioner's counsel to remain at visible but not audible distance during Section 108 Customs Act interrogation as aspect of fair investigation. However, HC denied relief for video-graphing the proceedings. Court noted other HC decisions viewing lawyer presence as not matter of right but found them persuasive only, not binding. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Apr 2025 10:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308659 Bombay HC allowed petition seeking advocate's presence during customs interrogation. Following SC precedent in Vijay Sajnani vs. Union of India, court permitted petitioner's counsel to remain at visible but not audible distance during Section 108 Customs Act interrogation as aspect of fair investigation. However, HC denied relief for video-graphing the proceedings. Court noted other HC decisions viewing lawyer presence as not matter of right but found them persuasive only, not binding. Case-Laws GST Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308659