<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (10) TMI 1183 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308660</link>
    <description>The Wakf Board&#039;s initial constitution under the 1995 Act did not require completion of the preliminary survey under Section 4, and defects or vacancies in its composition did not by themselves render it unlawful. The survey process was treated as important and quasi-judicial, but not a precondition to the Board&#039;s incorporation; the wakf lists published on 13.11.2003 and 30.12.2004 were therefore largely sustained, subject to limited reconsideration in specified cases. A Muslim public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act is not automatically a wakf, but it may still be treated as a wakf if its true character so indicates. The High Court&#039;s blanket interference under Article 226 was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:16:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (10) TMI 1183 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308660</link>
      <description>The Wakf Board&#039;s initial constitution under the 1995 Act did not require completion of the preliminary survey under Section 4, and defects or vacancies in its composition did not by themselves render it unlawful. The survey process was treated as important and quasi-judicial, but not a precondition to the Board&#039;s incorporation; the wakf lists published on 13.11.2003 and 30.12.2004 were therefore largely sustained, subject to limited reconsideration in specified cases. A Muslim public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act is not automatically a wakf, but it may still be treated as a wakf if its true character so indicates. The High Court&#039;s blanket interference under Article 226 was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>