https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440138 The special leave petitions were dismissed because the issues raised were already covered by the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd., and the pending review of that precedent did not affect its binding force for the present matter. The Court also condoned the delay in filing and reserved liberty to file a fresh petition if the review against Ganpati Dealcom is allowed, preserving the petitioners' ability to seek reconsideration should the precedent change. en-us Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jun 2026 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440138 The special leave petitions were dismissed because the issues raised were already covered by the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd., and the pending review of that precedent did not affect its binding force for the present matter. The Court also condoned the delay in filing and reserved liberty to file a fresh petition if the review against Ganpati Dealcom is allowed, preserving the petitioners' ability to seek reconsideration should the precedent change. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 05 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440138