<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 405 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal. The deduction of interest claimed against capital gains was denied as it was not related to the sale of the asset. Additionally, the classification of agricultural land as a capital asset beyond two kilometers from municipal limits was not considered a valid issue for appeal, as the assessee had already offered LTCG in the return of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2023 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 405 - ITAT PANAJI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) and dismissed the appeal. The deduction of interest claimed against capital gains was denied as it was not related to the sale of the asset. Additionally, the classification of agricultural land as a capital asset beyond two kilometers from municipal limits was not considered a valid issue for appeal, as the assessee had already offered LTCG in the return of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>