<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 390 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440117</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by both Appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The penalties on the Custom House Agent (CHA) firm and its partner were deemed unsustainable as the firm had not violated Regulation 13 of the CHALR, 2004, and a partner cannot be penalized separately once the firm is penalized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 21:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719150" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 390 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440117</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by both Appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The penalties on the Custom House Agent (CHA) firm and its partner were deemed unsustainable as the firm had not violated Regulation 13 of the CHALR, 2004, and a partner cannot be penalized separately once the firm is penalized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>