https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33282 Bombay HC allowed the petition, holding that Rule 6(1)-6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules (2002 and 2004) remain the same and the minor wording change in Rule 6(6) (using "excisable goods") simply broadens coverage to include dutiable goods exported under bond. The court found the policy permits Cenvat credit for inputs used in exempted goods and exports under bond, ordered that the petitioners may remove the goods on furnishing the bond in Form B-1 (Annexure 16), made the rule absolute, and declined costs. en-us Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33282 Bombay HC allowed the petition, holding that Rule 6(1)-6(4) of the Cenvat Credit Rules (2002 and 2004) remain the same and the minor wording change in Rule 6(6) (using "excisable goods") simply broadens coverage to include dutiable goods exported under bond. The court found the policy permits Cenvat credit for inputs used in exempted goods and exports under bond, ordered that the petitioners may remove the goods on furnishing the bond in Form B-1 (Annexure 16), made the rule absolute, and declined costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=33282