https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440116 The Madras HC article discusses conflicting opinions on whether habeas corpus remains maintainable after a judicial remand, with one view allowing it only where the remand is illegal, mechanical, or without application of mind, and the other treating a valid remand as generally barring such relief except in cases of absolute illegality or lack of jurisdiction. It also addresses alleged illegality in arrest and remand under the PMLA, including compliance with Article 22(1), CrPC Sections 41 and 41A, and PMLA Section 19, with differing views on whether arrest grounds were properly communicated. On custody, the opinions diverge on whether ED may seek custody under CrPC Section 167(2) and whether hospitalisation can be excluded from the initial 15-day custody period. en-us Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440116 The Madras HC article discusses conflicting opinions on whether habeas corpus remains maintainable after a judicial remand, with one view allowing it only where the remand is illegal, mechanical, or without application of mind, and the other treating a valid remand as generally barring such relief except in cases of absolute illegality or lack of jurisdiction. It also addresses alleged illegality in arrest and remand under the PMLA, including compliance with Article 22(1), CrPC Sections 41 and 41A, and PMLA Section 19, with differing views on whether arrest grounds were properly communicated. On custody, the opinions diverge on whether ED may seek custody under CrPC Section 167(2) and whether hospitalisation can be excluded from the initial 15-day custody period. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 04 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=440116