<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2096 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308641</link>
    <description>The High Court directed a Chartered Accountants&#039; Firm&#039;s writ petition to be treated as a representation to the Competent Authority. The Authority must inform the petitioner of their decision on the fee within eight weeks. No direction or observation on merits was given, leaving it to the authority to consider and decide. Parties have the liberty to file an application if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2023 20:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=719143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2096 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308641</link>
      <description>The High Court directed a Chartered Accountants&#039; Firm&#039;s writ petition to be treated as a representation to the Competent Authority. The Authority must inform the petitioner of their decision on the fee within eight weeks. No direction or observation on merits was given, leaving it to the authority to consider and decide. Parties have the liberty to file an application if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>