https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308640 The High Court issued notice to the respondents, with notice accepted by the counsel for respondent no. 1. Notice was to be served on respondent no. 2 returnable on a specified date. The operation of the challenged order and notice was stayed until the next hearing. The court directed the order to be given dasti under the Court Master's signature for further action. The judgment highlighted the importance of upholding arbitration agreements despite references to facilitation councils, ensuring consistency and effectiveness in resolving disputes under the relevant legal framework. en-us Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jul 2023 20:41:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308640 The High Court issued notice to the respondents, with notice accepted by the counsel for respondent no. 1. Notice was to be served on respondent no. 2 returnable on a specified date. The operation of the challenged order and notice was stayed until the next hearing. The court directed the order to be given dasti under the Court Master's signature for further action. The judgment highlighted the importance of upholding arbitration agreements despite references to facilitation councils, ensuring consistency and effectiveness in resolving disputes under the relevant legal framework. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308640